If G-d promised you a gift, would you hesitate? Would you even dare to criticize it and reject it? Yet, the meraglim, the spies that were sent to Eretz Yisroel, returned with a negative report, one which spoke poorly regarding the Land and declared disbelief that the Jewish people might inherit it. While there are various explanations for this puzzling and tragic episode that condemned us to forty years of wandering in the desert and established future national calamities (Taanis 29a), there is a evident lesson that we have a tendency to can apply in our own lives. That lesson is that the art of constructive criticism. It is an art because it demands a lot of talent, knowledge, and sensitivity.
As we see from the start of the parasha, it is even questionable on whether or not one ought to offer criticism in the primary place. Commenting on the seemingly superfluous language of "shlach lecha" (send for yourself), Rashi explains that "for yourself" suggests that per your (Moshe's) intention. G-d had not commanded Moshe to send spies to scout out the land. G-d promised that the Jewish folks would posses it. It had been only when the Jewish folks approached Moshe with the request to scout out the land, that G-d acquiesced. Nevertheless, He created it clear that this was not His initiative. G-d failed to raise for our feedback, nevertheless we have a tendency to insisted on putting in our own "two cents".
Though normally, we have a tendency to ought to not be quick to provide criticism, there could be things that warrant it or when our feedback is actually solicited. In these cases, we tend to should observe the art of constructive criticism, or what I like to call feedback. When the meraglim came back from spying out the land, they spoke poorly of Eretz Yisroel. They told of its supposed shortcomings and drew the conclusion that it might be impossible to conquer it and survive there as it's a "land that devours its inhabitants (thirteen:thirty two)". However Calev, who along with Yehoshua was part of the mission, presented a wholly different approach, "we tend to shall surely ascend and conquer it for we can surely do it (thirteen:thirty)." Tova haaretz m'od m'od (14:seven)" "The Land is very, terribly good." All of them witnessed the identical land, however the meraglim experienced it through a completely different lens, that of the essential eye. When the essential eye is one among negativity, when it's an ayin ra'a ( a bad eye) as opposed to an ayin tova (a sensible eye), the result can be devastating and demoralizing.
Criticism is solely positive when it is constructive, when it builds up an individual, not when it tears one down. When I was doing post graduate training in Imago Relationship Therapy, we tend to were required to point out tapes of our work with couples to our trainer. They were to be evaluated and if we had met the factors we have a tendency to would pass. It absolutely was a bit nerve-racking and vulnerable to work out ourselves on camera and be evaluated by a group. One factor that struck me about the feedback process was the protection and encouragement it provided. We have a tendency to knew as amateurs that our tapes wouldn't be flawless and we have a tendency to were wanting for feedback that we might implement to enhance our work. Everyone in the area provided feedback: what I liked about your work, a technical suggestion, and how I see you getting in your "growth edge." Any criticism was prefaced with appreciations or positive statements. A person needs to be designed up and feel good about what they did. The technical suggestions were specific and practical. This can be crucial as someone should understand what they did wrong and what they can change. General abstract criticism of the person's terribly being or of things they are unable to vary is unhelpful and potentially damaging. Finally, the "growth edge", what an exquisite way to label it! Rather than labeling what we have a tendency to are doing wrong and not providing any room for improvement, we have a tendency to view it from a positive angle. I learned that feedback should be given in an exceedingly supportive means therefore the person realizes what they need to boost and is galvanized to do therefore rather than focusing on the negative, bursting their bubble and leaving them helpless and unable to work out any rationality within the feedback.
One must walk away feeling sensible and confident about what was done right and motivated to improve. We tend to ask for feedback to feature additional objectivity in order to take a step back and see what 'really happened'. I feel that we tend to all have the desire to grow and would gladly welcome any feedback that assists us in that process. Although we tend to should remember that any criticism we have a tendency to receive continues to be someone's else opinion and that our self-price or performance isn't keen about another's approval, the ego is terribly fragile, and there is a sturdy would like to feel safe and supported.
Thus, it's crucial that any criticism given be constructive, to build, not to tear down. This can be a delicate art for whether or not we have a tendency to are not malicious, we have a tendency to tend to seem at the negative. The critical eye should be an ayin tova, not like that of the meraglim.
While the meraglim didn't want to deny their own fears, they might have checked out things during a more positive lightweight, found the nice within the 'dangerous', and drawn a different conclusion. If not given with sensitivity and knowledge, criticism will be terribly destructive. Besides what they said, they influenced others to follow in their negativity and caused the Jewish folks to get nowhere, wandering for forty years in the desert, and for that generation, never reaching their meant destination. When criticism is not given with care, it will terribly easily sidetrack a person and leave them feeling lost and discouraged.
Next time once we are in a state of affairs that warrants feedback, allow us to have the sensitivity to read with an ayin tov, providing specific details and sensible suggestions with the intent to create up the opposite person thus they will be inspired to grow and improve. Only in that approach will we become fully self-actualized, ready to succeed in our personal Eretz Yisroel.
Author Resource:-
Ralph Burdick has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Dislike Criticism? The Art of Constructive Criticism
You can also check out his latest website about
Howard Miller Grandfather Clocks Which reviews and lists the best
Howard Miller Desk Clock
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/feed-icon.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites