Tennis fans across the globe spent much of the Nineteen Nineties watching Pete Sampras raking in all the big titles on the ATP tour, including a series of grand slam wins that saw 'Pistol Pete' develop a reputations as a virtually unbeatable player.
No sooner had Sampras hung up his racquet when in walked a young Swiss player by the name of Roger Federer, who proceeded to take up where Sampras had left off and single-handedly dominate men's singles tennis.
Once four years spent blasting all opposition apart on the ATP tour, it absolutely was inevitable that some would begin comparing Federer to Sampras, and before we knew it a series of matches between the 2 legends had been arranged in Malaysia.
Youth vs. Expertise
To be honest to Pete Sampras, the competition in Malaysia was skewed from the start. The Yank retired from skilled tennis in 2002, and at age 36 is well past his best during a sport that sees players peak in their early twenties.
In comparison Roger Federer's career has reached a crescendo, with the twenty six year recent virtually unbeatable on the ATP tour over the past 2 years. Purely on the idea of the distinction in age and quantity of active play it had been obvious from the outset that Sampras' possibilities were very slim indeed.
As it turned out Pistol Pete place up a fight in Malaysia once losing the primary match by straight sets. In the second match Federer won a tighter game that visited tie-breaks in each sets. At this time the publicists for the tournament probably intervened, as Sampras produced a miraculous reversal in form to beat Federer by two sets in Macao.
Any tennis fans who watched the matches must have realised that the competition was in no approach a genuine live of either player's superiority over the other. The only means to realistically compare the players is to possess a take a look at their statistics.
A examine the stats
To make an accurate comparison of Sampras and Federer's talents one desires to appear at the
achievements of the former at the age of 26. By the year 1997 Pete Sampras had won ten grand slam tournaments including a run of four victories at both Wimbledon and the US Open. As compared, Roger Federer has taken 12 grand slam title so far, equaling or improving on Sampras' record in every grand slam.
A tough decision
Provided that Roger Federer had 53 singles title to his name by the age of 26, while Pete Sampras had racked up fifty two at the identical stage of his career one can see that naming which player is greatest is a powerful call. However, based purely on stats one has got to credit Federer as the superior player.
Several of Pete Sampras' fans are seemingly to disagree with this conclusion. After all, Sampras played in an exceedingly way more competitive era than Federer, was often injured in crucial matches and also faced down opposition from world class players such Andre Agassi, Patrick Rafter and Greg Rusedski.
Furthermore Sampras had a very different taking part in vogue to Federer that relied on incredible focus, the simplest serve in the history of the game and a unique vogue of taking part in each forehands and backhands. In the final equation it looks that a genuine comparison can only become viable when Federer wraps up his career, because the Swiss still wants two grand slam wins to prove once and for all that he's the best men's singles player in the history of the sport. With the Australian Open literally just around the corner all bets are on.
Author Resource:-
Leslie Donner has been writing articles online for nearly 2 years now. Not only does this author specialize in Federer Vs Sampras - Who Reigns Supreme?
You can also check out his latest website about
Managed Dedicated Server Hosting Which reviews and lists the best
Managed Dedicated Server Hosting
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/feed-icon.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites