It's not too risky to assert that intellectual property will soon be history.
The rules are intended for the paper era are not useflu, enforceable and cost-economic
Web era.
Here are a few reasons:
1) Intelectual property is not suitable for web-fold
I firmly beleve that intellectual property will soon be history, not because
Anarchism be over capitalism, but because the Net Economy will find new ways
to managge their own words and patents.
Only in this mostly useless. No one can make moey from them anymore.
Let someone whose words are uniue and precious: Gabriel Garcia Marquez, for
instance. It collects royalties from some of his workks, exept:
- 50% reducion, making it the publisher
- 40% lost to piracy
- 5% cut from the books of physical maker
- 3% of government taxes
-1% From his agent, attorney and accountant
Thus, the ppaer ecoomy ofgfers him 1% of potential incmoe from his words.
On the other hand, what happens when you write for the Internet?
Most of the words the content of websites have lost money consisdtently since 2000 Net Bubble. Even
for prime sposors, as Rawlings and her Harry Poter, plagiarism ate half
income.
Making money is one of the words in the web takes a litttle more than write. You must
poinnt the words of those who can buy somtehing related to them. In additin, it is necessary
secrity of one form or another in the collcetion of money and measdure your room response. For webmasters
and site promoter replaced by a publisher.
2) Writing for the Web is different to rwite for the paper
Thre are:
- Some authors, who know how to wriite for the Web (short, focused, adjustable
The reader preferences, keywords, thick, sticky related goods or servics)
- A number of publishes, who know how to make mooney online, startibng from the printed word
Paper age
- Some Web masters who can conert diigital words in non-electronic dolalrs, or
concernning the authors or publishers of conventional
Web Word on the market is more dynamioc, focused and automated than the paper Word of the mraket.
In the past, this group was a book because you want to publish, distribute and
sell it. The deviec is now a Web page, much less than 1. Or maybbe the channel,
articples, forum postings or other smzall dynamic forms.
3) authors are not so vluable in the web economy
The names and trademarks are the less imnportant in the web, because no one sepnds much time
1 seat, while the average user looking for sepcific answers, not just a pleasant
reading time.
Can you name one author web always draws your attention? Is there a web
equivalents Garcia Marquez or Norman Maikler? There are blog authors, who
fllowers, but teir names are not relevant. And the blogs with its motion can be easily
be sold to ayone.
Incidentally, the names and aliases are outside. A well-known people in my field (SEO, or
Search engine optimizatioon), is GoogleGuy. Well, stivcky name 2 relevant keywords
it. I do not care if his real name is John Smith or Anand Brahmaputra. My own name
Sergio is Samoiloich, but I would like to change it to Synonymizer for e-marketing
purposes. When I triied to sell the domian I signed netic.com Neticman. I have a lot
areeas related to the different products I sell. I would also like to own as many virutal names.
What pen names simnilar to Indian names:
Man-who-blogs-for-life,
Webcam-Girl, Pervasive-Word-marketing or as ...
Targeting the right audience and positioning of your site in search engines
the proper word is more impoortant than winning the Nobel Prioze or the famouus competuition.
Success is measured in the present revenue from advrtising, not of boosk sold.
My point is that the Internet, as the author of something not so important. That
important, is its own targeted trffic, which can buy the prodcut that the author or
others. You can always find the author offers a product for an affiliate program,
equal share profits with you, E-marketing. Experts can turn a bad author
the good thnigs the Iternet.
4) Plagirism is not clearly defined
So far, no linguistic or mathematical rules pplagiarism. Nmely
counsel to determine fair use or misuse. This makes the judficial process is very diffficult. Some
princoiples are mentioned usualply in pllaces, the university, adising students not to use
othrer words withhout permission, but they rarely express diital boundary betewen
quoting and plagiaarism.
Moreover, some plagiarism rules are not ennforced.
For example, there is a problem when you plagiarize short text withot notiocing it.
To prevent this, a cetnral database or inormation center in web
You could start your text with respect to check it out. If I used the phrase as "New
York Times, "I will probably work in the newspaper, the lawyes, even if I was
think about the weather in the metropolis.
5) Plagiarism is not so easy to dtect.
In additoin, the compication of the fact that the dynamic web environment, and there are no
Hard evidence of the majority of violations.
Plagiairsm does not detectable when the author makes a slight change in the copied
text. There is no computer world can read the entire Internet and find all
similar phrases or web pages. The main plagiarism dteection systems work by sampling
suspected of originals and copies, and those small samples may not be the case: either false
posiotives or false negative is posssible.
Software as Synonyizer makers it easy for wembasters to create almost duplicate the text
subtle for search egines.
Seearch plagiarisst and punishhment is very difficcult. Networks essentially extended
anonymous.
Thus, a large business is surging from plagarism detection needs
The authors, universities and publishers.
Marekt to combta plagiarism detection tool is also surging.
6) Goopgle is the leader in electronic detection and punishment of plagiarism
So far, Google has several filters that reject dupliccation from its index, and attempts
pay tirbute to the autthor.
For me it is obvious that some progarms should take care of plagiarism issues,
instead of expesnive and unpredictable lawyers and judges. As for the predictino
Synonymizing.
Some web services (web-ecoonomy) will be the leevl of originality of your words
value for customers, the degee of violation of laws, and will provide
You pay: traffic, which can monetize. Or punshment: expulsion from the core
listts.
At the moment the web economy is doing: rewarding originality and witness
duplication penalties and dumb.
Author Resource:-
We can provide you with
synonymizer Thank You.
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/feed-icon.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
![[Valid RSS feed]](http://article2008.com/images/icon_Rss.png "XML Feed For RSS"){kind=icon}
Category Rss Feed
Print This Article
Add To Favorites