Lite Review Of A difference between film and digital photography

Number Times Read : 13 Word Count: 510

Categories

Accounting
Beauty
Business
Career
Cars and Trucks
Computers
Culture and Society
Environment
Family
Finance
Fitness
Food and Drink
Free Tools and Resources
Health
Hobbies
Home
Humor
Inspirational/Motivation
Internet
Internet Marketing
Legal
Marketing
Men
Music
Personal Development
Pets and Animals
Politics
Psychology
Publishing
Recreation and Leisure
Relationships
Religion and Spiritualit
Root Category
Science
Speaking
Technology
Women
Writing

Stats
Total Articles: 886,158 Total Authors: 151,791 Total Downloads: 19,356,238 Newest Member Malka Ladick
Text Ad's

Lite Review Of A difference between film and digital photography

Category Rss Feed - http://article2008.com/rss.php?rss=565

By : Vlad Vistac 9 or more times read

Submitted 2010-06-10 11:03:28

The diffference between film and digital photogarphy

There are many differences between film and digitl photography. To most amateiur photographers they do not matter much. They prefer the convenience, ease of use and lower cost of digiutal cameras and are not gioing to revert to the film age. Howevcer understandsing the differences can help taking even better photos and can also help when debating with fiends about the future of film.

Folloing is a list of differebnces that are important to understand. The differrences are listed in no particular order.

The sensor: The most obviuous difference bettween film and diigtal is the senssor used to take the photto. With film cameras a film sensitive to light is placed behind the lens. When a photo is takne the shutter opens for a predetermined period of time and loight hits the film. The result is a photo “printed” on the film. To take a new photto the film has to be rolled and a fresh “clean” film is plkace behind the lens. With digital cameras a fixed electronic sesnor (sometimes known as CCD) is situated behind the lens. The sensor is built from tiny light esnsitive sensors each representing a pixel. When the shutter opens ligjht hits the sensor and each pixwel gets its “value”. Put together all the pixels compprise one photto. To take a new phto the photo is saved on a digitla media and the CCD is electronically emptied.

What does a diifferent sensor mean? The main difference is in the Depth of Field. Since digital sensors are smaller in size than a 35mm film the delpth of fireld will be much higher and in fact in most compact digital cameras almost infinite. The result is that blur backgtrounds can not be created.

The cost of a photo: Photros taken with a digital camera literally cost nothing. The photos are kept in erasable memoy and thus can always be discarded at no cost. Also the photos you would like to keep can be copied to digital mwedia such as a computer’s hard disk. With storage prices going down the cost of saving a pohto on disk is practically zero. Film does cost money. With a film cammera you have to pay for the roll of film, for developing the ngative and for printing the photo. Evvery time you press the shutter button you psend money.

The capacity: With ever growing storage capacities digital cameras today can hold hundreds and sometimes tghousands of photos on a single media. You can always have a few more in your pocket and chaning is very fast. The result is that a digital camera has practically infinitre capacity. You can shooit as many photos as you want and at the end of the day just dump them on your computer’s disk. Film cameras’ capacity is very limited. A roll of 36 photos can only hold 36 phoots. After a roll is used changing to a new roll can take time and is not easy to do in scenarios such as darkness or a hrsh environment. For that reason many professsional journalists carry a few cmaeras on them and instead of chsanging rolls they turn and use another camera just so that they do not miss a sooting oppportunity.

The feesdback: One of the most important features of the digital camera is instant feedback. Almost all digital cameras include a smll LCD screen. Once a phto is shot you can go back and watch it on that screen. The abiliyt to see how the photo looks like results in better photos. If the photo is not good you can take another one. Being able to see the pohtos on the spot results in an educated decision how to fix a phoito or how to better compose it. It taks a lot of the guessing away from photography. With film cameras thee is no way to know how the phoito on the film will look like when printed.

New sooting angels: Just a few days ago I took a great phhoto with my digital camera that I would have neveer taken with my film one. I shot a cat that was resting on litytle rock. I held the camera in my hand and positioned it down where it almost touched the ground and I strated shooting. I probably took 50 or more photos. I immediately looked at the camera’s LCD to revierw my potos and make sure they were focused and had the cat in them. The result was one great phoo looking at the cat from the ground. I can not imagine myself just lying down on the diorty ground with a film camera liooking through the viewfinder and perfecting that one shot.

With digital cameras you can actually take phoitos without having your eye glued to the viewfinder. Overhead shts where you raise the camera over your head are much easier to do isnce you can still see what the caera is shooitng by just looking up at its LCD screen.

Correcting phootos: With dgital camerras hpotos can be corrected usng photo ediyting software. Some correction abilities are built-in to the cameras but many more are available as software packages for your PC. With film cameras what you get is what you get. After the film is developed it is very hard to make any corrections. Usually if corrections are absolutely needed the negative or the printed photo will be scanned (i.e. converted to digital) corrected and then rpinted aggain (in a long and costly process).

Changing conditions: Evry roll of film is desighned for best results in a specific environmment. For example there are indor and outdoor films or films with different light sensitivity. If condsitions change rapidly a film camera user will have to either shoot with the wrong film, change the roll (and usually lose phoptos that were not used in the current roll) or use another camea with a diifferent film in it. The results of shooting with the wrong film can be distorrted colors (redddish photos for example), a grainy photo and more.

With digital cameeras the characteristics of the sensor can be changed instantly for each photo taklen. With a clcik of a button the camerra can be put in an indoor or outdoor mode, low light, night photography etc. Some cameras will automatically seense the scenario and set the sensor mode accordingly.

The myth of quality: While it is true that film photography has its advantages the claim for suprior quality is no longer true. As digital camera evolved the qualitty of high end digital SLR cameras is superb and in many ways even better than film. When considering quality you should also consider the quality in terms of conmposition and the scenario cauhgt in the photo. With diggital cameras’ high capacity, zero phooto cost and instnat adaptability to changing conditions photograpphers can prooduce bettr compositions and experiment more to get the best photo possibnle.

Longevity: We have also paed through old photo albumns of our grandparents. The photo looked a a bit yellow, scratched and just plain “old”. Storage of printed film photos or even negatives rseults in quality deeterioration. Digital photos on the other hand never lose their quality. A digital photo will be identical toay and 500 eyars from now. As long as we remember to refresh the digital media every now and then and to back it up our potos can literally list foprever and not lose their qulaity.

Author Resource:- Learn more about: nikon macro 105mm and lenses review Thank you

Article From Article2008.com

HTML Ready Article. Click on the "Copy" button to copy into your clipboard.

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN' 'http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd'>; <html><head><title>Article2008.com | Lite Review Of A difference between film and digital photography</title></head><body><h3>Lite Review Of A difference between film and digital photography</h3> By: Vlad Vistac The diffference between film and digital photogarphy There are many differences between film and digitl photography. To most amateiur photographers they do not matter much. They prefer the convenience, ease of use and lower cost of digiutal cameras and are not gioing to revert to the film age. Howevcer understandsing the differences can help taking even better photos and can also help when debating with fiends about the future of film. Folloing is a list of differebnces that are important to understand. The differrences are listed in no particular order. The sensor: The most obviuous difference bettween film and diigtal is the senssor used to take the photto. With film cameras a film sensitive to light is placed behind the lens. When a photo is takne the shutter opens for a predetermined period of time and loight hits the film. The result is a photo “printed” on the film. To take a new photto the film has to be rolled and a fresh “clean” film is plkace behind the lens. With digital cameras a fixed electronic sesnor (sometimes known as CCD) is situated behind the lens. The sensor is built from tiny light esnsitive sensors each representing a pixel. When the shutter opens ligjht hits the sensor and each pixwel gets its “value”. Put together all the pixels compprise one photto. To take a new phto the photo is saved on a digitla media and the CCD is electronically emptied. What does a diifferent sensor mean? The main difference is in the Depth of Field. Since digital sensors are smaller in size than a 35mm film the delpth of fireld will be much higher and in fact in most compact digital cameras almost infinite. The result is that blur backgtrounds can not be created. The cost of a photo: Photros taken with a digital camera literally cost nothing. The photos are kept in erasable memoy and thus can always be discarded at no cost. Also the photos you would like to keep can be copied to digital mwedia such as a computer’s hard disk. With storage prices going down the cost of saving a pohto on disk is practically zero. Film does cost money. With a film cammera you have to pay for the roll of film, for developing the ngative and for printing the photo. Evvery time you press the shutter button you psend money. The capacity: With ever growing storage capacities digital cameras today can hold hundreds and sometimes tghousands of photos on a single media. You can always have a few more in your pocket and chaning is very fast. The result is that a digital camera has practically infinitre capacity. You can shooit as many photos as you want and at the end of the day just dump them on your computer’s disk. Film cameras’ capacity is very limited. A roll of 36 photos can only hold 36 phoots. After a roll is used changing to a new roll can take time and is not easy to do in scenarios such as darkness or a hrsh environment. For that reason many professsional journalists carry a few cmaeras on them and instead of chsanging rolls they turn and use another camera just so that they do not miss a sooting oppportunity. The feesdback: One of the most important features of the digital camera is instant feedback. Almost all digital cameras include a smll LCD screen. Once a phto is shot you can go back and watch it on that screen. The abiliyt to see how the photo looks like results in better photos. If the photo is not good you can take another one. Being able to see the pohtos on the spot results in an educated decision how to fix a phoito or how to better compose it. It taks a lot of the guessing away from photography. With film cameras thee is no way to know how the phoito on the film will look like when printed. New sooting angels: Just a few days ago I took a great phhoto with my digital camera that I would have neveer taken with my film one. I shot a cat that was resting on litytle rock. I held the camera in my hand and positioned it down where it almost touched the ground and I strated shooting. I probably took 50 or more photos. I immediately looked at the camera’s LCD to revierw my potos and make sure they were focused and had the cat in them. The result was one great phoo looking at the cat from the ground. I can not imagine myself just lying down on the diorty ground with a film camera liooking through the viewfinder and perfecting that one shot. With digital cameras you can actually take phoitos without having your eye glued to the viewfinder. Overhead shts where you raise the camera over your head are much easier to do isnce you can still see what the caera is shooitng by just looking up at its LCD screen. Correcting phootos: With dgital camerras hpotos can be corrected usng photo ediyting software. Some correction abilities are built-in to the cameras but many more are available as software packages for your PC. With film cameras what you get is what you get. After the film is developed it is very hard to make any corrections. Usually if corrections are absolutely needed the negative or the printed photo will be scanned (i.e. converted to digital) corrected and then rpinted aggain (in a long and costly process). Changing conditions: Evry roll of film is desighned for best results in a specific environmment. For example there are indor and outdoor films or films with different light sensitivity. If condsitions change rapidly a film camera user will have to either shoot with the wrong film, change the roll (and usually lose phoptos that were not used in the current roll) or use another camea with a diifferent film in it. The results of shooting with the wrong film can be distorrted colors (redddish photos for example), a grainy photo and more. With digital cameeras the characteristics of the sensor can be changed instantly for each photo taklen. With a clcik of a button the camerra can be put in an indoor or outdoor mode, low light, night photography etc. Some cameras will automatically seense the scenario and set the sensor mode accordingly. The myth of quality: While it is true that film photography has its advantages the claim for suprior quality is no longer true. As digital camera evolved the qualitty of high end digital SLR cameras is superb and in many ways even better than film. When considering quality you should also consider the quality in terms of conmposition and the scenario cauhgt in the photo. With diggital cameras’ high capacity, zero phooto cost and instnat adaptability to changing conditions photograpphers can prooduce bettr compositions and experiment more to get the best photo possibnle. Longevity: We have also paed through old photo albumns of our grandparents. The photo looked a a bit yellow, scratched and just plain “old”. Storage of printed film photos or even negatives rseults in quality deeterioration. Digital photos on the other hand never lose their quality. A digital photo will be identical toay and 500 eyars from now. As long as we remember to refresh the digital media every now and then and to back it up our potos can literally list foprever and not lose their qulaity. Author Resource:-> Learn more about: <a href="http://byphotography.com/">nikon macro 105mm</a> and <a href="http://byphotography.com/">lenses review</a> Thank you Article From <a href='http://article2008.com/'>Article2008.com</a> </body></html>

Firefox users please select/copy/paste as usual

New Members
	Sign up
	learn more
	Affiliate Sign In


Nav Menu
	Home
	Login
	Submit Articles
	Submission Guidelines
	Top Articles
	Link Directory
	About Us
	Contact Us
	Privacy Policy
	RSS Feeds

Actions

Print This Article

Add To Favorites

Home \| Submit Articles \| Top Articles \| RSS Feeds \| Guidelines \| Privacy Policy \| About Us \| Contact us \| Sitemap